Petraeus Testifies! Bombshell Testimony Exposes White House Coverup!
Originally posted on November 18, 2012 @ 12:25 AM
Petraeus–Why He Really Resigned
General David Petraeus, U.S. Army, Retired, then the DCI (Director of Central Intelligence) and Director of the CIA, “fell on his sword” (killed his own career) in order to protect Obama from utter ruin. Petraeus resigned, not from his own affair's causing tongues to wag, but because President Obama may have lied to the world regarding what caused the attack on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. Worse, exclusive evidence now available suggests the attack was known of, in advance, by the government!
The House Select Committee on Intelligence vowed not to be thwarted by the familiar political act of abrupt resignation as distraction. It decreed that “if it took sending the House Master at Arms, to drag Petraeus back kicking and screaming,” then that's how it was going to be. And it was. Petraeus also testified before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
Sources familiar with the closed-door, classified hearings say Petraeus testified truthfully and straightforwardly. In a refreshing departure from the typical evasions, obfuscations and sudden memory lapses unusual among people with razor sharp minds, Petraeus laid out the damning facts, conclusively showing the Obama administration knew full well the attack was NOT the result of an anti-Islamic video, as it falsely claimed. The result of his testimony? There's already talk of impeaching President Obama!
Petraeus's Shocking Testimony–Petraeus Knew Attack On U.S. Diplomatic Facility Was NOT A Riot, But Terrorism, As It Unfolded
Contrary to the Obama administration's characterization of the wholly expectable 9/11 anniversary terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic facility as unexpected and unfortunate, my highly sensitive, well placed sources say David Petraeus testified, under oath, he knew, as the attack unfolded, that it was a terrorist attack. This flatly contradicts and invalidates what initially came from the Oval Office. That terrorist attack resulted in the killing of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, Foreign Service info system officer Sean Smith and two retired SEALs handling VIP security, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, whose bullet-riddled bodies testified to their devotion to duty.
How did Obama know the demonstration was a terrorist attack? “We had boots on the ground,” say my contacts. Why did we have boots on the ground? Our covert operatives were there trying to buy back weapons from a Libyan terrorist group (formerly U.S. backed Libyan freedom fighters against Gaddaffi), for subsequent shipment and delivery to Syrian rebels. Any of this sound alarmingly familiar? Consider Iran-Contra.
The best information, exclusively obtained, indicates the U.S. government knew at least 24 hours in advance, maybe earlier, that a terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya was imminent, claim deep black insider sources. Reportedly, the advance warning came from the covert buyback team and from other intelligence means. If so, then Obama may have American blood directly on his hands. Why? He had the means to stop the attack, as it unfolded, but did nothing. Nor is there any indication at all of a warning issued that an attack against the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya was expected.
Two Predators, A Refueling & Spooky
President Obama had the means to stop the attackers dead in their tracks. In fact, he had redundant and complementary means to not only end the attack but permanently remove the attackers as well. A MQ-1 Predator, armed with “at least one Hellfire missile, possibly two,” was overhead when the attack was filmed. Far more than an eyeball in the sky, the Predator alone could have wiped out the attackers with one shot.
Two Predators were originally up, but one had to depart to Sigonella, Italy for refueling. That also left? An AC-130U Spooky, arguably one of the most heavily armed aircraft ever to fly.
Does anyone here entertain even a shred of doubt as to the outcome had Spooky received the order to open fire against ~50 guys, running around at night, armed with AK-47s and RPGs, later mortars? That open fire order never came. Why? The Pentagon says there were no armed air assets overhead. If true, why not? If untrue, why is the Pentagon lying? Ultimately, responsibility for the multiply fatal Libyan embassy debacle resides squarely with the newly re-elected President Obama. If he knew in advance and did nothing, it is over for him. Of course, the coverup Petraeus exposed may do that by itself! Mr. President, what did you know, and when did you know it?