Navy Official Confirms UFO Chase Video Is Real
Don't Call It A UFO, But the Video Is Real–and You Shouldn't Have Ever Seen It
According to a recent IBD (Investors Business Daily) article I now can't find, but with the core information widely covered in other sites and on news, as seen here, the heavily reported and shown video of a UFO being chased in 2004 by a pair of Navy F/A-18 Super Hornets from the USS Nimitz, is real, is highly classified and should never have been released. The original story, not what the Navy official recently said, broke in late December of 2017, six years after the astonishing to those present incident. This is a concise and good article from the UK site Independent on that side of things.
Before continuing, a small digression is needed. One of the things which gripes Navy officials is that the term “UFO” has been used in reference to whatever was seen and recorded, but the, ahem, correct acronym is UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon), which has the marvelous effect (as seen from a distorting or better, hiding all things UFO viewpoint) of placing the most incredible craft and their human crushing extreme maneuvers into the same category as weird cloud configurations. If we know, from decades of sightings, UFO crash recoveries, reverse engineering and such what kind of craft it is (likely from where), then the term, at least as of the early 1980s, is IAC (Identified Alien Craft).
First learned this term from a SECRET (and other security restrictions) DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) Weekly Intelligence Summary, Ponder that tidbit. Chew it over. Think of the implications. Something else to ponder is the simple truth that we and a bunch of other countries have craft that are, to all intents and purposes, undistinguishable from real UFOs by most people.
Returning to the main story, we are being asked to believe that the Navy, which has been involved with UFO crash recoveries going clear back to around 1933 and is still guarding secrets from before Pearl Harbor was attacked, is so incompetent that it officially released what, given the extreme protections afforded to all matters UFO, had to have been at least TOP SECRET//CODEWORD video.
Even within the US military, the two-person rule applies. This means the secured items must always have two people in the room or be locked up and guarded. This was no accident, for in order to get from the vault or secure server to official Navy release, that video would've been through layers upon layers of command review, quite possibly as high as the CNO (Chief of Naval Operations). The evidence therefore supports a designer leak, a deliberate release of highly sensitive classified information in order, on one hand, to educate that part of the public switched on enough to pay attention to confirmed (yet deniable) disclosures on UFO matters.
On the other hand, the historical pattern has for decades been to put out the most astounding information, then nullify it or at least badly damage its believability fairly soon thereafter. Weirdly, and perhaps indicative that some sort of at least partial Disclosure is happening, is that this blockbuster evidence has NOT been denied, discredited, refuted or anything else! Such practices, though, have always been the norm prior to this. The taking away, if you will, is for the benefit of those who can't or won't deal with the realities of UFOs, ETs/EDs (Extraterrestrials/ Extradimensionals), the oh so related paranormal and more.
This is also a form of shock testing, wherein the public, at irregular intervals, is exposed to amazing, unbelievable information (may be true only in part) to see how the public does or doesn't react. In turn, that helps drive the long-running Alien Awareness Program. This operation is specifically designed to seed UFO information and disinformation to the public over a long period of time.
Television And Movies Seeding UFO and ET/ED Information and Disinformation For Decades As Form of Soft Disclosure!
It is trivial, if you know the history of television programs at all, to list scads of shows covering UFOs, ETs/EDs, the paranormal and many other topics, and we're not just talking recent ones. Take a gander at “My Favorite Martian”, “Mork and Mindy”, and “Alf”, for example, not to mention “Barney.”. Do you think it's an accident that the chilling TV “V” series has been done twice?
Spook sources tell me Gene Roddenberry, who created “Star Trek” and wrote many episodes, was getting fed nuggets by insiders and visited by ETs/EDs. Moreover, they tell me that the main ET/ED races on OST (Original “Star Trek”) were based on his own encounters. Have previously detailed the UFO and ET/ED truths revealed in “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” and “E.T.”, as well as the fact that both sets were crawling with operatives from a bunch of cooperating, competing, even hostile to each other spook organizations. There is a strong argument to be made that Steven Spielberg is either CIA or operating on its behalf, too.
Chris Carter, creator of “The X-Files”, has flatly stated he was worried the things he himself was putting into episodes for the show would get him hauled out of his office by government agents. Nor was this paranoia on his part, for what he didn't say, but spook sources have told me, was that they were feeding him super hot UFO and other intel info!
Dissecting and Deconstructing TV and Movies–Critical Viewing Vital
Who, people, is selling you what, why, when, how often? To what end? How did you feel about it? What, if anything did you do? What do you perceive, if you perceive, was the agenda behind what you watched? Whom does it benefit, and whom does it harm? Does it unite or divide you from those around you? Does it inspire good deeds or justify bad ones? Is there some sort of call to action?
Let me be blunt here. You need to learn to watch TV, if you're going to watch it, critically, and you sure as hell shouldn't let your kids watch anything without first evaluating it yourself.
Accidental Release or Designer Leak–Your Decision!
Given what you now know, what is your opinion regarding the Navy's official claim stating the UFO video's release was accidental?